GENERAL TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY

Generating Download Link...

GENERAL TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY

Tennis psychology is nothing over understanding the workings of your opponent's mind, and gauging the effect of your own game on his mental viewpoint, and understanding the mental effects resulting from the varied external causes on your mind. 

you can't be a successful psychologist of others without first understanding your mental processes, you want to study the effect on yourself of the identical happening under different circumstances.

GENERAL TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY


 You react differently in numerous moods and under different conditions. you want to realize the effect on your game of the resulting irritation, pleasure, confusion, or whatever form your reaction takes. 

Does it increase your efficiency? 

If so, strive for it, but never provides it to your opponent. 

GENERAL TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY Does it deprive you of concentration? 

If so, either remove the cause, or if that's out of the question strive to ignore it. Once you have got judged accurately by your reaction to conditions, study your opponents, to determine their temperaments. 

Like temperaments react similarly, and you will judge men of your type by yourself. Opposite temperaments you want to seek to check with people whose reactions you recognize. 

A person who can control his mental processes stands a wonderful chance of reading those of another, for the human mind works along definite lines of thought, and might be studied. 

One can only control one's, mental processes after carefully studying them. A steady phlegmatic baseline player is seldom a keen thinker. If he was he wouldn't adhere to the baseline.

The physical appearance of a person is typically a fairly clear index to his form of mind. The stolid, easy-going man, who usually advocates the baseline game, does so because he hates to awaken his torpid mind to be after a secure method of reaching the online. there's the opposite form of baseline player, who prefers to stay on the rear of the court while directing an attack intended to interrupt up your game. he's a really dangerous player, and a deep, keen thinking antagonist. He achieves his results by mixing up his length and direction and worrying you with the variability of his game. he's an honest psychologist. the primary form of player mentioned merely hits the ball with little idea of what he's doing, while the latter always encompasses a definite plan and adheres to that.

The hard-hitting, erratic, net-rushing player could be a creature of impulse. there's no real system to his attack, no understanding of your game. He will make brilliant coups on the spur of the instant, largely by instinct; but there's no, mental power of consistent thinking. it's a motivating, fascinating type.

The dangerous man is that player who mixes his style from back to forecourt within the direction of an ever-alert mind. this is often the person to check and learn from. he's a player with a precise purpose. A player who has a solution to each query you propound him in your game. he's the foremost subtle antagonist within the world. he's of the college of Brookes.

Second only to him is that the man of dogged determination that sets his mind on one plan and adheres thereto, bitterly, fiercely fighting to the top, with never an inspiration of change. he's the person whose psychology is straightforward to know, but whose mental viewpoint is tough to upset, for he never allows himself to consider anything except the business at hand. This man is your Johnston or your Wilding.

I respect the brain of Brookes more, but I love the tenacity of purpose Johnston. Pick out your type from your mental processes, and so see your game along the lines best suited to you. When two men are, within the same class, as regards stroke equipment, the determining thing about any given match is that the mental viewpoint.

Luck, so-called, is usually grasping the psychological value of an opportunity within the game, and turning it to your account. We hear an excellent deal about the "shots we've made." Few realize the importance of the "shots we've got missed." The science of missing shots is as important as that of constructing them, and sometimes a miss by an in. is of more value than a, return that's killed by your opponent. Let me explain.

A player drives you far out of court with an angle-shot. You run hard to that, and reaching, drive it hard and fast down the side-line, missing it by an in. Your opponent is surprised and shaken, realizing that your shot might still have gone in as out. He will expect you to do it again, and can not take the chance next time.

He will attempt to play the ball and will make up errors. you have got thus taken a number of your opponent's confidence, and increased his chance of error, all by a miss. If you had merely popped back that return, and it had been killed, your opponent would have felt increasingly confident of your inability to induce the ball out of his reach, while you'd merely are winded without result. Let us suppose you made the shot down the sideline. it had been a seemingly impossible get.

First, it amounts to 2 points in this it took one far from the opponent that ought to are his and gave you one you ought never to possess had. It also worries your opponent, as he feels he has thrown away a giant chance.

The psychology of a match is incredibly interesting but easily understandable. Both men start with equal chances. Once one man establishes a true leader, his confidence goes up, while his opponent worries, and his mental viewpoint becomes poor. the only real object of the primary man is to carry his lead, thus holding his confidence. If the second player pulls even or draws ahead, the inevitable reaction occurs with even a greater contrast in psychology. there's the natural confidence of the leader now with the second man moreover as that great stimulus of getting turned seeming defeat into probable victory. The reverse within the case of the primary player is apt to hopelessly destroy his game, and collapse follows.